Having a disabled parent allows me to understand this topic on a deeper level. This is actually a conversation that my father and I had prior to watching a movie where a character who wasn't disabled portrayed the role of a disabled person.
On one side of the argument, It's more of an ethical dilemma. Most people who believe only handicapped individuals should play handicapped characters want their to be an equal opportunity for these individuals. However it is understood that due to handicaps sometimes it is hard for disabled people to be actors in the first place.
On the other side of the argument, its more of a financial and numbers game. The budget and scale of the film come into play because if money is being put into the production, money is expected to be made after as well. Hiring big name actors such as Brian Cranston, to help create a buzz and generate income would increase profits. In most cases people on this side of the argument care more about money than ethical boundaries.
In the film The Upside, Cranston portrays a quadriplegic character who needs constant attention and care. While Cranston is not actually quadriplegic, he acted the part brilliantly. My dad has MD, and even he thought that Cranston showed how it truly feels to be handicapped. Working closely with people who have these handicaps will help to ensure that the role is played truthfully. Honestly, if whoever is playing the role brings truth to the character then that's all that matters.
Comments